Part of what I'm working through as an adult (like I imagine we all do) is to come to terms with how I was raised and what I've been taught to do, believe, and think. I also think that becoming an adult requires this kind of reconciliation and that it's necessary to take inventory of how you assert these things for yourself against upbringing and decide what you keep and what is bunk.
I had a conversation yesterday with my mother which I knew would go the way it did; I knew I was instigating, but I couldn't help myself. On the coffee table in her living room is a three-ring binder from her bible study that reads: "Christianity: Why We Believe What We Believe." My mother still attends a local church, volunteers her time there answering phones and doing mailings, and she has friends there. I don't begrudge her community involvement and sense of belonging; in that sense, I think churches can be wonderful places of connection to others, refuge for those who need it, and places containing overall peace. In fact, I think that's what they're supposed to be, and I have often discovered "religious" moments inside certain places, like being in Southwark Cathedral in London and listening to the choir at Even Song, or standing in an empty Brompton Oratory in Kensington and then sitting quietly listening to the sounds of Latin prayers. These are lovely moments when I truly believe in God and where I feel connected to the universe in a higher way that makes me feel quite contented. I understand the desire for this feeling and I believe that it exists.
I don't, however, buy any dictated religion or it's business-model, corporate-mentality, brainwashing bullshit designed to take money from people who don't have it in the name of God and use it to build obnoxious "campuses" and send missionaries to foreign countries when a bulk of their own congregations are losing jobs, homes, and unable to properly feed their children. Even my mother's church - where a glimmer of admiration still flickered for me because the people I know there seem reasonable and nice - hired a "marketing firm" to do their advertising after they spent, literally, millions of dollars to build a brand new church campus. If they can drum up millions - from anywhere - shouldn't that go where it's most needed? Couldn't they be sending people to college, helping to pay doctor bills, rescuing people from foreclosures, offering child care to working families, and on and on and on? If I ever suddenly had millions, I would share it - and I say that with honesty. Whenever I think of winning the lottery, one of the first things that enters my mind is what I could do with it to help everyone I know and even those I don't. Every person in my life would get a house, college educations for their children, investment accounts, means to take care of themselves and others. I'd pay it forward for generations and encourage everyone to do the same. Did you know that most charitable contributions for things like volunteer work for social services and money donations to homeless shelters come more often from people who are poor than anyone else? But giving away millions and millions to me is the lottery dream. Sure, I'd do things for myself, but those things are shockingly humble - I'd keep my house but it would just be paid off and everything in it would work properly; I'd keep my car too but I wouldn't owe anything on it. I'd fill our retirement accounts and Sami's college fund. I'd probably do exactly what I do now but I wouldn't owe on student loans and I'd get to spend more time traveling, but I doubt I'd do it lavishly because the real world is far more interesting.
But I digress. So I flipped through this book my mother had because I was curious about the answer - why do they believe what they believe? That seems like a pertinent query, and one I wish more people asked of themselves in a general sense. The answers were shockingly vague, as always and all boiled down to the same thing: because the Bible says so. Sigh. Why is that ever enough for people to hinge their entire world view upon? That's not a criticism, either, but a real question that has never made sense to me, even when I avidly attended church once upon a time. It's a book. It's even an interesting book filled with wonderful ideas and yes, we could all do well with some good advice about how to treat others and be good people. I can even see why someone would want to follow the general principles laid out in it - they are good ideas. But how on earth can we take a book written by many people that is incomplete, endlessly translated for centuries, and call it the Word of God? Doesn't that strike anyone else as being really arrogant? Inspired or not, how do any of these authors know what the word of God is? What if they misinterpreted? What if they brought their own biases to bear? How can we know who are the real and false prophets? This troubles me not because I wish to be contentious, but because it's not rational. If you want to know God - as much as any of us do - look around you. Watch a baby be born, think about the simple miracle of our human consciousness and its capabilities, cuddle a sleeping puppy, watch a sunrise, stare out into the ocean, look at anything under a microscope. There's God.
One of the questions the book asked at the end of its first chapter is, "What will you say about the Bible when confronted with a non-believer?" And it was blank. So I asked my mom about it. The rhetoric behind that question is of course what troubles me - the simple tone of the query requires an us-and-them mentality. She said she had no answer because she is never confronted. So I confronted her; I said by their definitions, I'm a non-believer. I'm not a Christian because I don't buy the dogma of what someone along the way just decided was Christianity. It doesn't mean I'm not spiritual, that I don't believe in God, that I don't strive to be a good person, or that I don't believe that there is life outside of this one that results in what we do here, but that's about all I'm willing to concede because the truth is, I don't know and I don't think we CAN know, and I refuse to have another human being, who is only as in-the-know as I am by virtue of his/her humanity to tell me otherwise. My mother immediately gets defensive and even when I told her I really was just asking her about what she believes, she replied, "it's just what I've always been taught to believe," which is also her defense for being racist, and seems an unacceptable one to me. Why is that a sufficient answer for any intelligent person? By that justification, I should be a gay-hating, racist, churchgoing, amen-shouting, stay-at-home mom with no dreams of betterment because that's how I was raised. I was taught to believe that white skin is better than anything else, and even though my parents have come a long way with educated children who chide them, they never stopped believing it - they just stopped saying out loud. I have risen above what "I've been taught to believe" and decided for myself what I believe, and I asked my mother what stops her from doing the same. She had no answer and it made me really feel sorry for her. My sister and brother and I did not spring forth from Zeus's forehead as intelligent beings; we got here from this gene pool of my parents, and I'm shocked at how that is possible now that I'm an adult.
How someone so narrow-minded and conformist ever raised me is an utter mystery.